Life Extension and Cryonic Suspension Issues

Life Extension

(CC) If the problem of aging is solved, what happens to the Supreme Court? Surely the founders did not intend for the justices to serve century long appointments ultimately making the president who gets to appoint justices more powerful as his appointments could change the course of the nation for centuries to come.

(CC) For institutions like the Supreme Court where immortality can greatly alter society wouldnít the incentives for murder increase? How can the criminal justice system adapt?

(CC) How would countries survive dictatorships when dictators would be in place for centuries instead of decades? If dictatorships become a permanent condition how can America with its term limits and constant turnover of political power adapt?  Wouldn't America's government structure be a liability?

(CC) Will improvements in stopping aging lead to greater unemployment rates? Will it take you longer to get the job you want lets say at age 60 because you don't have enough experience?

(CC) If calorie deprivation really helps prevent aging, wouldn't malnourishment be a new way to murder someone without consequences?

(RS) Your brain synapses are what build your personality and memory. It may be possible that you can scan your brain synapses as a backup, so that even if your brain is destroyed you can "reboot" and get back your personality and memories. Which of these sets of synapses is considered the real person for legal purposes? Especially during the time when you have both already scanned your brain, and your own functioning brain is still alive. Are there then two of you?

(PYS): Assume we can stop the biological clock at any age of our choice. What would the legal ramifications be? For example, consider the differing penalties we impose for the same crime when the act is committed by an adult v. a juvenile. Would two 17-year-olds (one of whom was actually 35) face different legal consequences for committing the same crime?

Cryonic Suspension

(MF) Oregon currently has a Death with Dignity statute, which, in some cases, is used by dying patients to control their own end-of-life care.  The law currently allows for cryonic preservation only after the person is legally dead.  What are the legal issues surrounding a lawsuit by a person with a terminal illness wanting to be cryonically preserved rather than waiting for the disease to run its course?  Is this just a matter of time?

(MF) If only a person's brain is cyronically preserved and she is given a new body at the time she is revived, is she still the same person?  Does she still have control over her assets, etc that belonged to her before she was preserved?

(MF) What about inheritance rights?  Most inheritance rights terminate at a person's death, or a will may allow for a person's issue to inherit his share.  If he were cryonically preserved for 200 years, could he then sue his issue for his inheritance or a portion of it when he was revived?

(MF) What if a person were sentenced to life in prison, and that person chooses to be cryonically preserved when she dies?  If she is revived, would she have to continue to serve the life sentence in prison?  How could the law be changed to handle these kinds of situations?

(RS) In cryonic suspension, you can choose to freeze your whole body or just your "neuro" or brain. If you choose to freeze just your brain, they will build you a new body when you are revived. Mr. Merkle suggested they would have a catalog of sorts, where you could choose what kind of body you want, a kind of "cosmetic surgery to the extreme." What legal implications will this have in terms of people changing the way they look altogether, or maybe appropriating the likeness of another whose looks they prefer?

(RS) It is a possibility that your brain can be revived "in silico" or as a computer model version of yourself. This version will be able to talk with the doctors and other people with all your same personality and memory. What is the status of this computer model of yourself? Is this model legally a person? Can it act for you legally (ie: making contracts)?

(RS) If a person is cryonically frozen but their spouse is not frozen, and the unfrozen spouse remarries, what will be the legal status if the frozen spouse is revived? Has the unfrozen spouse committed polygamy, since she will now have two husbands?

(CC) Who pays for the revived person to be re-adapted to society upon revival? If society changes drastically while they were frozen and they are unable to adapt will they become a drain on society creating in essence a new welfare class? Will mal-adjustment be a new defense for crimes?

(CC) Assuming cryonics will revive the dead can wrongful death actions be brought against the cryonics lab if the liquid nitrogen is drained and thaws the bodies? What if someone was to deliberately unfreeze the cryonically preserved is this the equivalent of murder? Would resurrection become a right of every person and if so how could the legal system calculate and compensate for the loss of this right?

(CC) Considering cryonics is still an experiment what are the consequences today if someone was wrongfully thawed?

(CC) If someone is murdered and then frozen are the consequences to the murderer less because the victim can have another life? If the murderer is still in jail when the person is revived should they be released from prison?

(CC) Would the consequences be different for killing someone by shooting them in the heart and by shooting them in the brain, because cryonics canít be used on the brain dead?

(PYS) With whom does Alcor/CI/LEF make a contract, the deceased while alive or until they die a second time? If there is an overt breach, i.e. the company picks up the body and just throws it in a dumpster, who has standing to sue? May the patient's heirs sue? Can they sue as third party beneficiaries, or will they need to sue in tort on a survival action, or on an emotional distress theory? What if a third party was counting on a patient's death for some reason, and the company delays it via cryonics. Cause of action?


CC: Colleen Coen
MF: Maura Fleming
RS: Rebecca Stuart


Last year's legal research by Douglas Oguss

Last year's legal research by Ada Wong

Legal Research from previous years.


Table of contents page

Course page

My Home Page