Artificial Intelligence

(CC) If AI computers commit crimes what should be the proper punishment? Should they face the same punishments as humans or should they be treated as a defective product and be destroyed? Would their creators be held liable for the AI's bad actions?

(CC) What functions in society would AI beings fill? Would they generally become a slave race? What can be done to ensure humans dominion over machines? Is this necessary?

(CC) What rights would AI be entitled to? If I create an AI computer to cook my food, clean my home and watch my kids, would I have to compensate them for this work, give them time off or is the mere fact that I gave them existence enough?

(CC) The desire to not use humans in war is a strong one, what danger does the possibility of using AI in wars pose? What oversight can exist to ensure things don't go wrong?

(CC) If AI is used to do things for humans that we donít like to do, in essence freeing us from our chores, do we as humans lose anything by being freed from this monotony? Would we lose humility and become a society of people with a sense of entitlement? Additionally if you can create an AI for the limited purpose of doing your dirty work i.e. do things you would never do yourself, for example steal from your neighbor, what would stop you? Does the fact that you receive the benefit without taking any of the risk increase the crime rate?

(MF) What if we are able to create software programs that are as intelligent as human beings, and these programs are able to function autonomously.  Presumably, if the computer the program resides on is connected to the internet, the program would be able to conduct business transactions all over the world.  How would you establish jurisdiction over a computer program?  What if the computer where the program was created resides in Germany, but the program enters into a contract to do work in California with a resident of California.  Could the California resident file suit against the program in California?
 
(MF) Following on that question, what if the AI can function autonomously, ie enter into contracts, scam internet users, etc., but has no tangible physical presence other than the computer it was created on, who is responsible for the AI's actions?  If the AI has no money, property, etc., suing the AI would be pretty pointless.  Could there be any liability on the part of the person who created the program?
 
(MF) What if the AI commits a crime?  How do you incarcerate a computer program?  Would the government have to create a storage facility for rogue computer programs?
 
(MF) What if Virtual Reality developed to the point so that a person could be plugged in and live his or her entire life in VR?  How do these people support themselves?  Do they have to have enough money saved to support their physical existence?  Do they still pay taxes?  Do they become part of the Welfare system?

(KT) Professor Friedman argues that there are some serious legal questions regarding the “copying” of human brains in computer format – such as, when you switch the program off, is it murder? Can it vote? Does it have legal rights? Would advancing a rule of law stating that any form of artificial intelligence – be it a robot, a direct copy of a human’s brain, or a generic brain built not in the model of any particular person – cannot be afforded legal rights solve the problems above? What are the drawbacks to such a rule?

(KT) The Professor states that “Finally, there is the possibility that consciousness, self-awareness, will, depends on more than mere processing power, that it is an additional feature which must be designed into a program, perhaps with great difficulty.” In reference to the question above, rather than afford no protections to artificial intelligence creations, what if legal rights were only extended to those with levels of consciousness? Is that not what truly distinguishes humans from other forms of artificial intelligence? How could one attempt to prove that, for example, a robot running on artificial intelligence that killed another person had the requisite level of consciousness to make it subject to criminal penalties?

(KT) How can artificial intelligence truly replicate what humans consider to be “free will?” Does not the mere fact that AI software runs on a specific set of commands, albeit complex ones, mean that given any factual situation, we would be able to predict how an AI would react?


Virtual Reality

(DF) Will virtual reality create new sorts of intellectual property--in a fictional universe? If I have a very popular VR game, can you set your new game in a different part of the same invented world/history as mine?

(DF) What rights can the firm running an online game like World of Warcraft establish by contract? In particular

1: Can they control the sale of in game items for real money outside of the game?

2: Can they disavow liability if something goes wrong with their server and the character you have spent two years building up and identifying with no longer exists?

(CC) As gaming gets more intense and more like real world experience does the potential for injury increase, is it user beware or can the manufacturer be held liable if an 80yr old breaks his hip playing virtual soccer?

(CC) If you can create an ideal you in virtual reality how does the real you interact in the real world given that the persona you create in virtual reality is how you feel most confident? 

(KT) Would deep VR, where one can go into with a “socket at the back of his neck” as per Professor Friedman’s examples and the Matrix, lead to real-world problems? A famous experiment once allowed a mouse to choose between food and cocaine by merely pushing a button. The mouse pushed the cocaine button so fast and repetitively that it overwhelmed his desire for hungry. The mouse ended up dying of starvation. Assuming that deep VR could essentially “trick” our real-world bodies via sensory manipulation, do we risk seeing the same result as the mouse in the experiment?


Legal Research on VR from past years.

Legal Research on the question of virtual infidelity.

Legal Research on whether a machine is alive.

CC: Colleen Coen
DF: David Friedman
KT: Kevin Thelen
MF: Maura Fleming

Table of contents page

Course page

My Home Page