Of course, the legal situation is more complicated than my simple description implies. If the risk I am imposing on you is sufficiently large and obvious, you may be able to get my hazardous activity enjoined. And:

Where the injury is slight, the remedy for minor inconveniences lies in an action for damages rather than in one for an injunction. Kubby v. Hammond, 68 Ariz. 17 , 198 P.2d 134 (1948). Moreover, some courts have held, in the "balancing of conveniences" cases, that damages may be the sole remedy. See Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co."

Cameron, Vice Chief Justice, in Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc (1972) 108 Ariz. 178, 494 P.2d 700. This is the case that I cited earlier in this chapter as an example of incomplete privilege.